Apparently Huxely was just about done when he requested (by a note)that his wife inject him with the drug - it would have been a very colourful ending, at least in Huxley's imagination.
Did his wife murder him? Nah. Euthanase him? Yeh, at his request.
You're correct. Underpants not so much. Once, a long time ago (in a galaxy far away) I had a liason with a girl who wore yellow underpants with elmo on them. Disturbing.
With events like that colouring your life, no wonder you sometimes have trouble sleeping Sol.
I'd always thought men were far too, err, distracted, to notice the momentary (if at all) appearance of underpants, but you prove me wrong.
I've never understood the expression describing a man as being a "pants-man", which is currently being thrown around as one of numerous descriptions of the now unemployed (but rich) former CEO of DJs.
So, is this what it means to be a "pants-man": you take the time to notice pants, or underpants, as the case may be?
Truth is I am more likely to be a frock-man than a pants-man. I don't know what it means. I have a suspicion about what it means: nothing.
According to the urban dictionary it means "Womaniser". I find myself coming across this site quite often when testing out new (or what seemed to be new) neo-logisms.
Like LSD
ReplyDeletej
Guess I'll never be an intellectual then, Caz ;)
ReplyDeleteErr, does this mean his wife murdered him with an overdose of LSD Justin?
ReplyDeleteAfter all these years she still seems pleased with her efforts.
Apparently Huxely was just about done when he requested (by a note)that his wife inject him with the drug - it would have been a very colourful ending, at least in Huxley's imagination.
ReplyDeleteDid his wife murder him? Nah. Euthanase him? Yeh, at his request.
j
Mmm I have a crush on Janice Peterson from SBS news. Intellectualism and sex at once!
ReplyDeleteEspecially with her happy pants:
http://25.media.tumblr.com/cW1mx4n94r1f08oyfe70Fz5Ko1_400.jpg
They sort of look like angry monster pants Sol.
ReplyDeleteThose teeth are awfully BIG.
You're right. Vagina dentata all over again!
ReplyDeleteJ - I was just joshing.
ReplyDeleteSol - the myth is true, true! Arrrhhh!
I still think it'd be worth it. She has such pretty eyes! And ridiculous pants.
ReplyDeleteIt must be a guy thing Sol. Men are suckers for women in ridiculous pants.
ReplyDeleteMen in ridiculous pants? Not so much.
You're correct. Underpants not so much. Once, a long time ago (in a galaxy far away) I had a liason with a girl who wore yellow underpants with elmo on them. Disturbing.
ReplyDeleteExtremely disturbing.
ReplyDeleteWith events like that colouring your life, no wonder you sometimes have trouble sleeping Sol.
I'd always thought men were far too, err, distracted, to notice the momentary (if at all) appearance of underpants, but you prove me wrong.
I've never understood the expression describing a man as being a "pants-man", which is currently being thrown around as one of numerous descriptions of the now unemployed (but rich) former CEO of DJs.
So, is this what it means to be a "pants-man": you take the time to notice pants, or underpants, as the case may be?
As opposed to being a "frock-man"?
Truth is I am more likely to be a frock-man than a pants-man. I don't know what it means. I have a suspicion about what it means: nothing.
ReplyDeleteAccording to the urban dictionary it means "Womaniser". I find myself coming across this site quite often when testing out new (or what seemed to be new) neo-logisms.
I know what it means Sol, but don't understand the provenance, as it makes no particular sense.
ReplyDeleteNeither does "teaching grandma how to suck eggs".
Did grandmothers used to have a habit of sucking eggs?